Reference for Bava Batra 92:6

שלח ליה ר"נ בר רב חסדא לר"נ בר יעקב ילמדנו רבינו אריס מעיד או אינו מעיד הוה יתיב רב יוסף קמיה אמר ליה הכי אמר שמואל אריס מעיד והתניא אינו מעיד

has no <i>hazakah</i>. Why so? Because we may presume that permission was given him to do so.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And therefore the owner saw no need to raise a protest. This is the rendering of Rashb. The Aruch renders, 'The owner regards him simply as an overseer,' and therefore saw no need to protest. ');">¹⁰</span> R. Nahman b. R. Hisda sent [an inquiry] to R. Nahman b. Isaac [saying]. Would our teacher [be so good as to] instruct us, whether a metayer can testify [to the title of his employer]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supposing that it is contested by a third party. ');">¹¹</span>

Explore reference for Bava Batra 92:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.